Sunday, February 24, 2013

to Ministry of Social Affairs on the eve of my possible arrest!



Khuon Ranin
Ministry of Social Affairs, Veteran
and Youth Rehabilitiation
# 788 Monivong Boulevarde
Sanghat
Boeng Trbek
Khan, Chomkamon
Phnom Penh

24th Feb 2013

Dear Khuon Ranin

On 21st Feb I received a letter from Pastor Brian Mulheran of Citipointe church in which he threatened to have me ‘forcibly removed’ and to initiate actions that would result in my being arrested and jailed in Cambodia for crimes that he alleges I have committed.

Pastor Mulheran’s letter and my response to it can be found at:


The threat implicit in Pastor Mulheran’s letter can be interpreted in one of three ways:

(1) It is just a crude form of intimidation intended to scare me off; to prevent me from exposing Citipointe church’s human rights abuses in Cambodia.

(2) Pastor Mulheran really does believe that he is able to pick up the phone and make a request to your Ministry that I ‘be forcibly removed’.

(3) Citipointe church has established a relationship with your Ministry in which it is possible for the church to arrange to have me ‘forcibly removed’.

I will not conjecture as to which of these three is the case. I do, however, take Pastor Mulheran’s threats seriously and suggest that if your Ministry is not in the habit of being instructed by NGOs whom to arrest of trumped up charges, that you inform Citipointe church that such intimidating behavior will not be tolerated by yourself.

The premise upon which Pastor Mulheran believes that Citipointe can have me arrested is that I have filmed Rosa and Chita – the daughters of Chanti – and that these girls are ‘deemed’ to be the victims of Human Trafficking. As you know full well, as your Ministry knows full well and as Citipointe church knows full well (and his done for close to five years), Rosa and Chita are not victims of Human Trafficking and never have been. Citipointe church has chosen to describe them as such because it suits their purpose in trying to intimidate me, using Cambodian law, in ceasing production of CHANTI’S WORLD – a documentary record I have been working on in Cambodia this past 18 years. I will not be ceasing production and if Citipointe does manage to arrange for my arrest this will not impede the progress of my film at all as all of the footage shot this past 18 years is in Australia. The church is fighting a losing battle and, I would suggest, Pastor Mulheran’s 21st Feb letter is a last ditch attempt to save the church from extreme embarrassment when the film comes out.  Citipointe church’s other reason for wishing to present Rosa and Chita as victims of Human Trafficking is that it provides the church with a great marketing angle. Presenting Rosa and Chita as victims of Human Trafficking is much more likely to get sponsors and ‘poverty tourists’ to open their wallets and enrichen Citipointe coffers than presenting Rosa and Chita as they are in reality – the daughters of poor parents.

I have suggested to the church that a much more appropriate way to deal with the corner it has painted itself into is to start making a contribution to helping the entire family. This is what they claim is their intention on their website. This is what the church has failed to do this last close to five years.

The only ‘crime’ I have committed has been to help a very poor family over the years to the best of my ability. The church claims that all its actions are legal and that it is only operating within the guidelines set up and administered by your Ministry. Several questions arise.

(1) Is it the policy of your Ministry that the access of Rosa and Chita to their family (and vice versa) be restricted to a few hours per month?

(2) Given the close bonds of love that exist between parents and their children, what logic informs causing such distress to both the parents and the children by so limiting their access to each other? Has Cambodia learnt nothing from the Khmer Rouge experience when the breaking up of families was part of their policy? We in Australia have learnt a lesson in the disastrous impact that such a policy can have on both Aboriginal children and their families.

(3) Does the Ministry condone the practice whereby a Christian NGO such as Citipointe church forcibly converts two daughters of a Buddhist family to the Christain faith. This is, after all, against the law in Cambodia and show great disrespect for the official religion of Cambodia.

(4) Why does the Ministry condone Citipointe church’s refusal to allow Rosa and Chita to participate in any of the Buddhist festivals or rituals with the rest of their family?

(5) Why does you Ministry condone Citipointe church’s refusal to allow Rosa and Chita even to attend the wedding of their aunt in Prey Veng the weekend before last?

(6)  Why does your Ministry allow Citipointe church to advertise itself on the internet as an organization dedicated to the rescuing of girls who are victims of Human Trafficking when, by the church’s own admission, only four girls currently resident in the She Rescue Home are victims of Human Trafficking? That is four out of 25 or 16%.

(7) Does you Ministry believe it to be appropriate that any of the girls resident in the She Rescue Home be used by Citipointe church as tourist attractions? This question is particularly pertinent in the case of the four girls who are genuine victims of Human Trafficking. Why should these traumatized girls be subjected to having their hair washed (see Citipointe website) each and every time a new group of ‘poverty tourists’ arrives in Phnom Penh. This humiliating practice is indicative of the very low level of understanding that Citipointe has of the emotional and psychological problems suffered by the victims of sexual abuse.

(8) Why does your Ministry allow Citipointe to present itself as being committed to reintegration and to helping entire families when, in the case of Rosa and Chita, the church has done nothing in close to five years to even begin the reintegation process or to help the rest of the family?

(9)  Why does you Ministry allow Citipointe church to present Rosa and Chita as victims of Human Trafficking when, as your Ministry is well aware, they are and have been never been victims of Human Trafficking.

(10) Could the Ministry of Social Affairs please provide Chanti with copies of all legal documents that have been drawn up between Citipointe and your Ministry since 2008. Such documents should include the agreement Citipointe claims it had with the Department of Foreign Affairs giving it the right to hold Rosa and Chita contrary to the express wishes of their mother and father.

In relation to Pastor Mulheran’s thinly veiled threats to have me arrested, jailed and banned from coming to Cambodia, does Citipointe have such power over the Ministry that it can ask you to accede to such requests? I sincerely hope that the answer to this is ‘no’.

In the interests of the human rights of children I believe that it is time for ‘orphan tourism’ as it is practiced by NGOs such as Citipointe be banned. This practice treats children  as a tourist attraction and is an abuse of their human rights - particularly in the case of those girls who are genuine victims of Human Trafficking. The fact that these NGOs make a profit from this practice is exploitation in itself. As you will be aware, only 27% of the residents in Cambodia’s orphanages have no parents. Or, to put it another way, 73% of the residents In Cambodia’s orphanages have at least one parent. Why are these so called ‘orphanages’ not assisting the families of these 73% financially – particularly given that it costs 8 times as much money to support a child in an institution as it does to support them within their existing family. Cambodia has replaced the ‘adoption’ business that flourished late last century with an ‘orphanage’ business and there is no shortage of NGOs (both international and Cambodian) prepared to cash in on it.

If it is your intention to have me arrested could you please let me know on what charges so that I can seek some legal advice?

best wishes

James Ricketson

No comments:

Post a Comment