Thursday, February 14, 2013

Will Citipointe allow Rosa and Chita to attend their aunt's wedding?



Leigh Ramsay
322 Wecker Road
Carindale
QLD 4152

14th Feb 2013

Dear Leigh

It comes as no surprise to me that you have not responded to my letters of 6th, 10th or 12th Feb. Indeed, it would surprise me if you did. You clearly hope that by burying your head in the sand like an ostrich and hoping the annoying Mr Ricketson will just disappear, that he will disappear. Alas, here he is again asking you questions you do not wish to answer and making available to the public (through his blog) just what Citipointe’s modus operandi is in Cambodia, as opposed to what the church claims, on its very very misleading website, to be doing here.

Chanti has asked me yet again, as her advocate (you have a copy of the relevant document signed by Chanti) to ask you to allow Rosa and Chita to accompany herself and the rest of the family to Chhork’s sister’s wedding this coming Sunday – 17th Feb. As you know, Chhork is Chanti’s husband and step-father to both Rosa and Chita. You have never before allowed Rosa and Chita to attend any family functions and I don’t imagine that you are going to have a change of heart this time around. God forbid that these two young Cambodian girls be exposed to Cambodian tradition and culture in the form of their aunt’s wedding! What deleterious effect might this have on Citipointe’s cult-like determination to turn Rosa and Chita into evangelical Christians in the Citipointe mold if they were to attend a Buddhist wedding ceremony!

Nonetheless, I do want to put this formal request in writing  since miracles do occur and perhaps you are not totally incapable of behaving like a proper Christian and will allow ALL of Chanti’s children to be present for their aunt’s wedding!

As always I will also publish this letter on the internet so that readers of my blog (growing in numbers weekly) can be in no doubt at all that Citipointe has deliberately, and over a period of years, sought to alienate Rosa and Chita from their family, from the Buddhist beliefs of their community and from Cambodian culture in general. A blatant human rights abuse – one of several practiced by Citipointe church.

It is worth mentioning here for new readers of my blog that Chhork, as a tuk tuk driver, earns between $30 and $35 a week or $1,500 a year. This figure is supplemented by small amounts of money earnt by Chanti’s mother, Vanna, in the weaving of bracelets to sell to tourists and with money earnt by Chanti selling scarves, sarongs and other artifacts to tourists, earning roughly $500 a year.

$2,000 is not a lot of money for a family to live on for a year but is considerably more than many Cambodians must subsist on.

The family income is supplemented by myself in the following manner:

Annual rent:                                                                                                    $840
Annual school fees for James and Srey Ka @ $270 per annum                     $540
One $40 bag of rice per month                                                                       $480
Medical expenses for the family per annum                                                  $300

This brings the family’s annual income  up to around $3,600.

Now consider how much it costs to keep one girl in Citipointe’s She Rescue Home. You will not reveal such costs but based on figures you once had published on your website and my knowledge of the cost of living in Cambodia, including rent, it costs in the vicinity of $500 a month to keep one girl in the Rescue Home.

So, it costs Citipoine around $7,200 per annum to keep Rosa and Chita in the She Rescue Home. Or, to put it another way, Citipointe spends double Chanti’s family income to support Rosa and Srey Mal each year.

Or, to put it yet another way Citipointe church could save itself $3,600 a year by returning both Rosa and Chita to their family and making a contribution of $3,600 to helping support the entire family. Alternatively, Citipointe could save most of the money is spends keeping Rosa and Chita in an institution, making only the following contributions to the family income:

Family medical expenses (including Rosa and Chita)                                   $500
School fees for four children (including Rosa and Chita)                              $1,100

In short, for the sum of about $1,500 a year Citipointe could be making a significant contribution towards making this family self-sufficient, whilst providing all of Chanti and Chhork’s children with the education they are going to need to lift the entire family out of poverty. Instead, Citipointe has chosen to make no contribution at all towards the welfare of the whole family, no contribution at all to the education of James and Srey Ka, no contribution at all towards the medical expenses required by Chanti to have a tumour removed from her wrist or, this past week, to be cured of her pneumonia.

Even at this late stage, and I mean today, Citipointe could (1) Allow Rosa and Chita to accompany their family to their aunt’s wedding this coming Sunday, (2) Promise to return Rosa and Chita to the care of their parents and (3) Offer to make a small contribution towards the ongoing support for the entire family over the next 10 or so years. $15,000, spread over 10 years, in addition to my own contributions and the money that the three breadwinners in the family can earn (Chhork, Chanti and Vanna) could completely transform this family’s fortunes and give all the children a chance in life that their mother, father and grandmother did not have as they were growing up.

best wishes

James Ricketson

No comments:

Post a Comment